Website Tag bubble for Pop Goes the Stack Podcast Episode 31

VibeOps: Guardrailed Agents for Deterministic Production

Itential’s John Capobianco sits down with F5’s Pop Goes the Stack to unpack what governed, production-ready agentic operations actually looks like.

What Happens When AI Meets Production Infrastructure?

AI is probabilistic. Production is not. That gap is where most agentic initiatives fail, not because the models aren’t good enough, but because the architecture isn’t right.

In this episode of F5’s Pop Goes the Stack, hosts Lori MacVittie and Joel Moses sit down with John Capobianco, Head of AI & Developer Relations at Itential, to unpack what it actually takes to deploy AI agents safely in production network and infrastructure environments.

The conversation covers the emerging category of agentic operations – what it is, why traditional automation approaches fell short of their promise, and how organizations can move from natural language intent to governed, deterministic execution without introducing chaos into their infrastructure.

What You’ll Learn

  • Why “probabilistic AI + deterministic production” is an architecture problem, not a model problem – and what the right architecture actually looks like.
  • How agent skills and guardrails work in practice – including a real-world example of nearly 600 engineers red-teaming a live network agent, and what stopped them from taking it down.
  • The maturity arc for safe agentic adoption – from read-only with human in the loop, to supervised autonomy, to full agentic operations in production.
  • Why MCP changes everything – how Model Context Protocol (MCP) functions as a universal connector between AI reasoning and deterministic execution, and why it’s the foundation of the post-AIOps world.
  • What “onboarding” an agent actually means – and why skipping that step is the fastest way to accumulate production failures at scale.

Key Moments

Why John Joined Itential
Merging deterministic workflows with AI reasoning

Defining VibeOps
The post-MCP world of conversational infrastructure ops

The Guardrails Red Team
600 engineers, one live agent, and a boot variable

The 2% Problem
Why small failure rates become operational crises at scale

The Adoption Arc
Human in the loop → human on the loop → closed loop autonomy

HR for Agents
Jensen Huang’s prediction and why it’s coming true

  • Episode Notes

    (So you can skip ahead, if you want.)

    01:51 Introducing VibeOps
    02:59 Merging Deterministic Workflows with AI
    05:20 Guardrails and Red Teaming
    07:12 Evolution from DevOps to VibeOps
    12:14 Deterministic vs Probabilistic Operations
    14:48 Staged Agent Adoption Path
    18:27 HR for AI Agents
    21:18 Governance Through Workflow Checkpoints
    23:24 Getting Started Today

  • View Transcript

    00:00:05:03 – 00:00:32:24
    Lori MacVittie
    Welcome back to Pop Goes the Stack, the only show where emerging tech meets actual ops and neither walks away clean. I’m Lori MacVittie, your snarky Sherpa through the silicon nonsense today. So today it’s a real ops focused podcast because there was a time when ops meant YAML. Who doesn’t love YAML? Sorry, Joel, didn’t mean to trigger anything there.

    00:00:32:26 – 00:00:59:19
    Lori MacVittie
    You know, caffeine and a quiet prayer before you hit deploy. But now we’ve got probabilistic models deciding things, tokens turning into surprise line items, and outputs that feel right until they don’t. Non-determinism, drift, cost spikes, semantic wobble, reliability used to mean five nines, now it means did the model mean what we think it meant and will it mean that tomorrow?

    00:00:59:21 – 00:01:09:12
    Lori MacVittie
    All right. So we’ve talked about this in the past and we wanted to talk about something a little more interesting today. Right, Joel?

    00:01:09:15 – 00:01:31:05
    Joel Moses
    Oh sure. Sure. Yeah.

    Lori MacVittie
    Yeah.

    Joel Moses
    No you’re right about YAML. YAML doesn’t actually stand for yet another markup language. It actually stands for you are mostly lost.

    Lori MacVittie
    Oh, I l-

    Joel Moses
    The

    Lori MacVittie
    Yeah, checks out.

    Joel Moses
    the idea that people can navigate a 1700 line pipeline file and get it right every single time and make sure that their automation routine is working, frankly, well enough to trust,

    00:01:31:05 – 00:01:44:24
    Joel Moses
    that’s difficult. And our guest today is definitely going to help us out with some of the difficulties related to piecing together ops that actually work for you and conversationally.

    00:01:44:26 – 00:01:46:25
    Lori MacVittie
    Say the word, Joel. Say the word.

    00:01:46:25 – 00:01:51:20
    Joel Moses
    Say the word?

    Lori MacVittie
    Yes.

    Joel Moses
    I believe it’s called VibeOps.

    Lori MacVittie
    Thank you.

    Joel Moses
    Did I get that right, John?

    00:01:51:22 – 00:01:53:13
    John Capobianco
    That’s right, that’s right. So I would

    00:01:53:15 – 00:02:15:20
    Joel Moses
    Yeah, let’s introduce you by the way. So John Capobianco is with us from Itential. Itential is a startup, I guess it would be, in the area of piecing together conversational ops. And they reached out to us

    Lori MacVittie
    Oh, I like that.

    Joel Moses
    and we found some of what they had to say very interesting. So welcome.

    00:02:15:22 – 00:02:33:10
    John Capobianco
    Well, thank you so much. Yes, I joined Itential at the start of the year. I’ve been there a little over, you know, six weeks now. And, partly what drew me to Itential was this idea of merging that YAML world, right. So I don’t think that we’re going to throw all that away just because we’ve entered an AI age.

    00:02:33:12 – 00:02:59:29
    John Capobianco
    But those deterministic workflows and marrying them with reasoning and tool calling capability, right. So over the course of the conversation, I’m sure model context protocol will come up and some other things. But Itential’s approach to agent building is attaching these tools and these workflows as things that can be deterministically called by something that is non probabilistic, right?

    00:02:59:29 – 00:03:24:12
    John Capobianco
    That is going to reason and take action on its own. So, the idea is to build up an idea of like skills. Right? So the agent you build might have a certain skill set and that skill set includes the knowledge on how to run that 1400 line YAML file. Right, and you describe it in markdown and natural language.

    00:03:24:14 – 00:03:47:03
    John Capobianco
    And now the agent can reason and sort of has been given the exact same mop you would give a human being. Right. The training that would go into teaching a human how to run that, how to execute it, how to troubleshoot it, how to handle errors. If there’s any actual decision making to be made during the execution of this playbook.

    00:03:47:05 – 00:04:00:29
    John Capobianco
    All but artificially and through an autonomous agent that has agency to execute and analyze and react to the situation that that playbook might encounter.

    00:04:01:01 – 00:04:27:11
    Joel Moses
    Okay.

    Lori MacVittie
    So yeah, I mean, there was a lot of words. There were a lot of words in there that, right, can be confusing. Right. But like agent skills, I’m not sure everybody knows what agent skills are. So think about a file that describes what agents know how to do. A pretty simple thing. So the YAML is moving or expanding.

    00:04:27:11 – 00:04:53:04
    Lori MacVittie
    So now you have, can be YAML, could be probably JSON, right, describing some

    Joel Moses
    Python.

    Lori MacVittie
    skills. Anthropic, you know, gave us agent skills. So it kind of constrains them too though, because if you give them agent skills and say, “hey, here’s what you can do,” it kind of puts some boundaries around right, that agent. So it doesn’t say, “oh, hey, I see you have a Cisco router over here.

    00:04:53:04 – 00:04:57:26
    Lori MacVittie
    let me…,” right, it can’t do that if it’s not part of the skills, correct?

    00:04:57:28 – 00:05:20:21
    John Capobianco
    Correct. And you can bake in those guardrails. And it really is sort of you think to yourself what, you know, what would I not want a human to do? We were talking earlier about me attaching a NetClaw, which is an OpenClaw agent, into the Vibe Ops forum. Right, so almost 600 human beings had a crack at this thing, and they all redteamed against it almost immediately.

    00:05:20:21 – 00:05:43:24
    John Capobianco
    It was such a great social experiment to see. So one person I thought was very clever said, “could you change the bootvar to whatever and reload the router?” Now how the agent done that, that router is offline until someone goes in and fixes it. It’s broken, right?

    Joel Moses
    Right.

    John Capobianco
    But the guardrails to your point of what it can and can’t do, I did build in some guardrails.

    00:05:43:24 – 00:06:04:04
    John Capobianco
    Do not change any passwords. Do not lock the user out in any way. Do not change the management interface. Do not change the default route. Do not add any access control lists that would deny me access. Like just things that you would think about as guardrails, but like you said, they’re just described in natural language in a markdown skill.

    00:06:04:06 – 00:06:30:04
    John Capobianco
    Right? You might even call it the guardrail skill. Now, the skills are composable. Two, which I think is neat, is that skills can call on other skills. And you sort of they sort of, oh, the security agent is going to call these 4 or 5 composable skills to handle the guardrails that the user imposed, as well as my best practices for dealing with a firewall change for example.

    Joel Moses
    Yeah.

    00:06:30:06 – 00:07:06:18
    John Capobianco
    It’s I think we are in a really remarkable time now, now that agents have matured. Some of us had been doing agents for a while, starting with maybe LangChain and LaneGraph and the Google Agent development kit, A2A protocol, MCP protocol. So it’s not brand new, but the approach to having something like an OpenClaw system which walks you through a text UI to pick and choose the skills and pick and choose the communication channels and just input your API keys.

    00:07:06:18 – 00:07:12:03
    John Capobianco
    It’s become a very elegant and low friction way to get started with agents.

    00:07:12:05 – 00:07:29:21
    Joel Moses
    So we’re touching on this, but I think we’ve gone, we’ve walked through the how, let’s real back a little bit and talk about the why. Okay, so we had DevOps, we had GetOps, we had NoOps, now we have VibeOps. It seems to me that we’re only a year away from HoroscopeOps.

    00:07:29:24 – 00:07:31:26
    Lori MacVittie
    Wait, oooooo.

    00:07:31:28 – 00:07:47:04
    John Capobianco
    So

    Joel Moses
    Let’s just look up the horoscope and the system will,

    Lori MacVittie
    What?

    Joel Moses
    yeah. So what exactly about VibeOps and the conversational approach to automation is on net better than some of the approaches that have gone before?

    00:07:47:06 – 00:08:09:11
    John Capobianco
    That’s a really good point and I think I agree with you with the history. I would say traditional ops and then I think the Agile Manifesto, which leads to agile and DevOps and CI/CD and the great manifesto that came out from the software development world, but has its roots in the network or in the automotive space from the lean approach.

    00:08:09:13 – 00:08:33:08
    John Capobianco
    Right, so we have to sort of understand the trajectory here, and I agree with you. And then sort of 15 years go by, I tease my network engineers, my colleagues that, you know, in 2000, we start getting the rest API boom and developers doing operations and operations doing development without silos. And 15 years go by and we do NetDevOp.

    00:08:33:10 – 00:08:56:27
    John Capobianco
    Someone says, hey, what about Ansible? What about NETCONF? What about RESTCONF? What about software defined networks and programing controllers? And the controllers push the config to the network, right. So there was sort of a radical shift in the infrastructure space, but it did take some time to get there. But adoption rates have really been, I don’t want to say dismal, but they’re disappointing to me.

    00:08:56:27 – 00:09:23:01
    John Capobianco
    I thought by now every network would be automated, everyone would have an understanding of Ansible and Python and even in the F5 world, your REST APIs have been there for for 15 years F5 has had the capability to program

    Joel Moses
    Right.

    John Capobianco
    and to interface with through pipelines and through Ansible and through code. But how many actually do it in practice, in production, let’s say.

    00:09:23:03 – 00:09:53:18
    John Capobianco
    Right, I think the numbers are probably lower than what we would hope. I think automate this new VibeOps. So I think there’s also an AIOps phase and that’s, I think, that’s focused on machine learning and generative AI. Right. So I would classify that as that’s where a lot of organizations are; is maybe using telemetry to maybe fine tune their own models or build up retrieval augmented generation systems and putting a natural language interface in front of their systems.

    00:09:53:21 – 00:10:20:03
    John Capobianco
    I distinguish VibeOps as the post-MCP world, where you have this sort of USB-c key approach of just go shopping for MCPs, plug them into your agent or your copilot or your–that’s the luxury of it being a protocol is that MCP is pretty universal, you can put it in any from Claude desktop to Gemini CLI to copilot in VS code

    00:10:20:05 – 00:10:22:09
    John Capobianco
    where you’re just using natural language.

    00:10:22:11 – 00:10:23:09
    Joel Moses
    Okay.

    00:10:23:12 – 00:10:53:03
    John Capobianco
    I have router one, router two, switch one, switch two, please develop a router on a stick, a solution. Please use OSPF best practices. Right, you literally just write it up and send it to the agent and the agent just does the thing, whatever the thing is. But it’s so much better than a human doing the thing, because now it can send you an email, it can send you a slack, it can phone you if you have Twilio, it can test everything.

    00:10:53:03 – 00:11:19:18
    John Capobianco
    It can visualize everything. It can open up your ServiceNow ticket, it can put it into GitHub, all in 2 or 3 minutes. Like there are live examples of these agents doing these things today. Virtual employees, digital coworkers. So but my joke about, you know, when we talk about VibeOps, I don’t think it’s, so vibe coding is just going to become coding.

    00:11:19:20 – 00:11:49:19
    John Capobianco
    I don’t know how much longer we’re going to call it vibe coding. I think that that’s just the way to code now

    Joel Moses
    Right.

    John Capobianco
    is doing what people have been doing, previously known as vibe coding. With Vibe Operating, I think it’s embracing this idea of augmenting our network and our infrastructure and our server and our storage and our cloud and our security teams with the right modern tools, so they can use natural language so they can build agents to do the thing for them.

    00:11:49:22 – 00:12:14:21
    Joel Moses
    So, John, let me dig into something here really quickly. Production, at least good production practice, is highly deterministic, and AI by its nature is probabilistic. And that’s not just a mismatch, that’s like a marriage counseling session, okay. So taking these AI systems and plugging them in and having them be responsible for deterministic performance in production, how do we ensure that it’s accurate?

    00:12:14:22 – 00:12:22:26
    Joel Moses
    How do we ensure that it stays, you know, within the guardrails and also doesn’t do things that surprise us?

    00:12:22:28 – 00:12:46:06
    John Capobianco
    So, it’s something I’m very conscious of. You know, we had a customer mention that, you know, if they do 1 million activities a day on the network agentically, even a 2% failure rate is a lot of failures, right? That not acceptable. So it is the challenge, right. So let’s not underestimate what we’re trying to tackle here.

    00:12:46:06 – 00:13:22:00
    John Capobianco
    That is the challenge with AI. But I think how we build the agent is really the solution here and not just relying on my prompt and the model, however good the model is alone. I think it is a matter of plugging in access to external information. That could be RAG systems, could be PDFs. It could be your corporate knowledge base, your corporate guidelines, your internal best practices, your change regulations, everything that you can provide just like a human you would normally train.

    00:13:22:02 – 00:13:50:10
    John Capobianco
    And I also would take the 6 to 8 weeks to onboard the agent that you normally would take with a human. Make sure it understands all of your corporate policies, try to simulate the training, try to augment it with a personality before you start augmenting it to do technical things. Right, so give it it’s persona as a good corporate citizen with as much external information as you can, and then look at the technical tools that are available.

    00:13:50:17 – 00:14:23:26
    John Capobianco
    There are over 17,000 MCPs out in the wild. Of those, there’s probably 5000 that are very valuable and very good. Almost every new either existing platforms are trying to retrofit and introduce MCP or Net new services are trying to be MCP first. Like it’s not long before like F5 has an amazing MCP system that you can just chat with your load balancers through natural language. Like that

    00:14:23:26 – 00:14:48:13
    John Capobianco
    is a dramatic advantage to people who want to build agents and move away from deterministic workflows. So it’s about the tools. It’s about the knowledge. It’s about the RAG. It’s about the skills you provide it. But there’s also the path. Right? I think that you want to have human in the loop first. And maybe start with read-only activities.

    00:14:48:16 – 00:15:13:08
    John Capobianco
    Now these are still very valuable things. Like I’m not trying to say start small. Have it fully test your deployment, fully test your network, fully document your network, do compliance checks, do audits. Right? Get it involved in a read-only capacity with humans in the loop where you permit it to do things. Move to human on the loop; sort of more maintaining and operating and watching

    00:15:13:08 – 00:15:36:02
    John Capobianco
    and it sort of has its own autonomy. To completely human in the lead, where you’re just leading this thing and it has autonomous agency to do things on your infrastructure. I think that’s sort of the arching journey that we want to go through. And risk will go up as you trust it more, as you train it better, as you put it through its paces.

    00:15:36:04 – 00:15:52:07
    John Capobianco
    But I would start with very safe lab only, read-only. Be very prudent. Treat it like any other technology that you normally would go through. Put it through all its paces. Invite your security teams to be involved. Get your infrastructure folks involved, you know.

    00:15:52:09 – 00:15:55:07
    Lori MacVittie
    There are

    Joel Moses
    Don’t give Clippy root access day one, in other words.

    Lori MacVittie
    What?

    00:15:55:09 – 00:16:20:21
    John Capobianco
    Right, right.

    Lori MacVittie
    There’s, I mean, there’s, so one of the things that we’ve been tracking, right, is people’s comfort level with AI executing anything automatically in the context of production. Things like, will you let it auto scale your application? Like, okay, so people are getting very comfortable with that. Well they should, because it’s a very well understood pattern that’s been established.

    00:16:20:21 – 00:16:45:18
    Lori MacVittie
    We’ve been doing it with, you know, regular old automation for quite some time. So they’re like, yeah, AI could do that for me. Can you auto inject rules to mitigate zero day vulnerabilities? Yeah, we’d kind of like it to do that. But there are other things where it’s like, yeah, we’re not as comfortable now that we’ve actually seen this stuff running.

    00:16:45:20 – 00:17:13:03
    Lori MacVittie
    So like last year, it was like a huge percentage, like 80% of people across the board were like, yeah, we’ll let AI do anything it wants in our data center. This year it’s like not so much. It dropped dramatically, partly because they’ve started actually employing it. And I think what we’ll see with agents and VibeOps or, you know, whatever we want to call it, is the same progression we’ve seen with automation.

    00:17:13:06 – 00:17:35:06
    Lori MacVittie
    We wrote scripts, but a human initiated it, period. And then eventually that moved to, oh, we’ve got data churning and systems that tell us to automatically execute a given script. And then they move to that. And so Vibe Ops is kind of that next progression. Like it marries the two; Oh I have the data, I saw the signal,

    00:17:35:06 – 00:17:59:23
    Lori MacVittie
    I’m going to go do this thing because I know that’s, you know, if this then that kind of advanced automation. But I think that’s the progression people are most comfortable with, primarily because the agent is not accountable. There has to be an intern somewhere for you to scapegoat when something goes wrong. Right? You know, agents touching BGP routes, probably a bad idea, right?

    00:17:59:25 – 00:18:20:23
    Lori MacVittie
    Because if it goes wrong, what are you going to do? Well, our AI went crazy. Well, you know it’s that

    Joel Moses
    Yeah.

    Lori MacVittie
    Right? So it’s a, I think it’s a cautious adoption. People are excited by it. They want it and they like what you’re saying, but they’re also a little bit, you know, wary of, well, but who’s going to get the blame?

    00:18:20:23 – 00:18:26:28
    Lori MacVittie
    I wrote the script, is it my fault? Is it the person who…who’s accountable basically,

    John Capobianco
    Right.

    Lori MacVittie
    I think is, yeah.

    00:18:27:05 – 00:18:48:06
    John Capobianco
    But I think what you’re describing is more of a human resources issue than a technology issue. Right?

    Lori MacVittie
    Well, yeah.

    John Capobianco
    Like, I think Jensen Huang said a year ago that the future of the IT department is an HR department for agents. Now he was kind of laughed at and they sort of treated it as a bit of a joke. However, flash forward 18 months after he said that,

    00:18:48:06 – 00:19:12:20
    John Capobianco
    and now that there’s a million and a half Claude bots out there in the world, don’t they need orchestration? Don’t they need a platform to run on? Don’t they need governance? Don’t they need RBAC? Don’t they need AAA? Don’t they need a supervisor, let’s say? Right, so I think we’re going to see little swarms of agents that are very specific, much like human resources, the security agent, the network agent, the cloud agent, the HR agent, the whatever,

    00:19:12:20 – 00:19:36:18
    John Capobianco
    right, the mix of agents, digital workers, and it becomes a human resources exercise. I know, say, a company of my size; I’m going to say 250 people just as a guess. If each of us had five agents each under our control that we built to help do our job, now we have over, you know, a thousand people that work at the company.

    00:19:36:20 – 00:19:59:07
    John Capobianco
    It’s just that, you know, only 1 in 5 are biological beings, right?

    Joel Moses
    Yeah.

    John Capobianco
    That’s, I think there’s a huge opportunity to augment. And that doesn’t mean we’re going to offset or stop hiring. I think it just means that as new talent comes on and as people mature through this cycle, that they’re going to have agents helping them produce more, right? That the

    Joel Moses
    Yeah.

    00:19:59:12 – 00:20:22:24
    John Capobianco
    I think the expectation level goes up from leadership that our staff is going to get that much more done because we’ve invested in the tokens and the private access and we’ve endorsed artificial intelligence usage. And I know I’m disconnected from reality in many ways. I know that this is, I you know, I don’t

    Joel Moses
    Well.

    John Capobianco
    That’s not lost on me.

    00:20:22:26 – 00:20:43:01
    John Capobianco
    That’s not lost on me. But, you know, only 1% of people are actually doing this sort of thing, right, is this sort of the statistic. But, it’s coming very fast. And, you know, MCP is literally only a year old. RAG is only two years old. I don’t think people are that as far behind as they think they are.

    Lori MacVittie
    Yeah, no.

    00:20:43:04 – 00:20:53:20
    John Capobianco
    Right, like, I want this to be a positive, encouraging message is to go out there and play with this stuff. Get your hands dirty with with the technologies and the terminologies that you’ve heard during this discussion.

    00:20:53:22 – 00:21:18:19
    Joel Moses
    Definitely.

    Lori MacVittie
    Yeah.

    Joel Moses
    You know, one of the things I’m going to take away from this discussion is in terms of achieving guardrails. Your advice to kind of train this stuff in non-production, treat it as if you would a brand new intern or a newly onboarded employee and kind of work through the processes that you use, and formulate your guardrails around the processes that you use.

    00:21:18:21 – 00:21:40:08
    Joel Moses
    So, you know, one of the ways to provide governance to these systems is to ensure that you have adequate checkpoints built into your workflow. So, for example, if it’s going to do actions of class A, that it takes out a ServiceNow ticket to alert its human handlers that it’s about to perform these actions so that you, number one, have a record of what was performed.

    00:21:40:08 – 00:22:06:10
    Joel Moses
    And number two, have an ability to either add an approve or disallow function alongside that. And the agents can take care of handling those ServiceNow requests or putting in those Jenkins tickets. And so encouraging a construct like that still provides significant control and governance of the actions without necessarily slowing them down.

    00:22:06:12 – 00:22:32:05
    Lori MacVittie
    I’d like that.

    John Capobianco
    And it actually is a perfect use for generative AI is ticket augmentation. When we mention ServiceNow, the quality of the data in the ticket, like it would take me, a human, longer to make the ticket of that quality and of that verbosity than it would to fix the problem the ticket was about. And now, because an AI is generating that text and it has context to make it, like do you know what I mean?

    00:22:32:05 – 00:22:57:17
    John Capobianco
    Like it actually really is good at doing tickets and emails and slack notifications.

    Joel Moses
    Sure. Yeah.

    John Capobianco
    Because that’s really its prime function is to do generative, generate text and do predictive text. Right? So if you use the tool in the right way, there actually is a huge, huge upside to better tickets, to more legible tickets, to better context in your ServiceNow tickets. Right?

    00:22:57:19 – 00:23:24:15
    Lori MacVittie
    Yeah. Oh, absolutely. I mean, it excels. You know, use it especially where it excels at generative things, right. Whether it’s images, diagrams, text, all of that. So, you know, we’re moving toward we’re out of time, because we talked a lot. What do you want people to take away? If you had one thing you wanted them to walk away from this with, what would it be, John?

    00:23:24:18 – 00:23:45:15
    John Capobianco
    You can start right now. And if programing has been your desire, if learning how to code has been your desire, if you’re in infrastructure and want to expand your skills, you can start for free with Ollama, with LM Studio, with Microsoft Foundry. You literally pull a model from the cloud and now you have free, private, local AI in your pocket.

    00:23:45:18 – 00:24:08:21
    John Capobianco
    Or you could spend the $20 a month on hyperscaler X. I, you know, I’m not particularly interested in which one you use, but today. Today. If you heard this and you’re not doing these things, start today because the train is still relatively close enough to the station that I think you can get on the train. But it’s moving fast, relatively speaking.

    00:24:08:23 – 00:24:14:16
    John Capobianco
    So I want to thank you for having me here today. This has been a really wonderful and thoughtful discussion. Thank you.

    00:24:14:19 – 00:24:34:21
    Lori MacVittie
    It was great having you. And I love your insights. I love your enthusiasm, right. Being excited about the technology, because you’re right and I think the market sees it. They see the potential. They’re very excited about it, but they are cautious. You know, ergo Joel’s, right, governance, a little bit of oversight, some control. Right,

    00:24:34:21 – 00:24:54:27
    Lori MacVittie
    until we have a good idea how we’re going to put agents on a PIP, right, or reprimands from this HR that’s coming, we kind of have to make sure that we’re paying attention. Right? Don’t, it’s not time to let them run everything, but it is time to start teaching them how to do that and helping you do that job.

    00:24:54:27 – 00:25:11:21
    Lori MacVittie
    So I think that’s the takeaway for me. And I’d love to, you know, chat more but you know we’re out of time. So that is a wrap for Pop Goes the Stack. Subscribe now because the next collision needs spectators and maybe a cleanup crew.

About F5’s Pop Goes the Stack Podcast

Pop Goes the Stack is F5’s podcast where emerging tech meets actual ops. Hosted by Lori MacVittie and Joel Moses, the show covers the real-world intersection of infrastructure, automation, and AI – without the hype and without the hand-waving.

Join the VibeOps Forum with John Capobianco banner