If you’re in the trenches of network automation, you already know the tension: engineers want flexibility and control, while IT leadership wants consistency, security, re-usability and scale. The latest EMA research captures this perfectly: 64% of IT organizations are looking for low- or no-code platforms, but 64% of enterprises still rely on homegrown scripts to get the job done.
So how do you bring these two views together and make the case for an automation platform that meets everyone’s needs?
Engineers lean on homegrown scripts because they can tweak, tune, and tailor them for their specific network. Python scripts and Ansible playbooks are fast, powerful, and precise, which are the ultimate “engineer’s choice” for getting things done. But as networks scale, the tradeoff is clear: more scripts means more maintenance, more complexity, and more risk.
Meanwhile, IT leadership sees the bigger picture. They’re focused on:
The tension here isn’t about which side is right. It’s about how to bridge the gap without starting from scratch.
The EMA Report highlights a path forward: modular platforms that don’t rip out what engineers have built, but build on top of it. Platforms like Itential’s bring three critical capabilities together:
Frame it as an evolution, not a replacement.
Engineers keep control of their scripts, but gain governance and scale.
Highlight the ROI.
Less time spent maintaining scripts, faster delivery of network services, and better security.
Tell real-world stories.
Like Armstrong’s journey, where a small team of engineers turned Python scripts into orchestrated, self-service workflows without losing what made them work in the first place.
The future of network automation isn’t about choosing between scripting or platforms. It’s about bringing them together and showing both engineers & leadership how modular automation can scale what’s already working.
See how Itential connects AI reasoning to governed execution across your entire infrastructure.